Islide note4 verification#

No: the slide contains an obvious missed dyskaryotic abnormality. Rock your favorite classic controller on our classic Mantra style. Yes: categorise the slide as ‘satisfactory with learning points’. Be a player with the Exclusive ISlide Controller collection. obviously technically inadequate that should not have been reported.glandular abnormalities of low number and/or subtle architectural/cytological changes.low abnormal cell numbers (less than 50 cells in liquid-based cytology (LBC) sample).Decision point 3: Does the slide fall into one of the ‘difficult to identify’ categories (bearing in mind knowledge at the time of the original report)? No: comment on whether the sample is adequate or not, and the degree and type of any abnormality present. Yes: categorise the slide as ‘satisfactory’. Decision point 2: does the review agree with the original cytology report as issued? Unsuitable slides do not necessarily reflect the technical quality of the slide at the time of the original reporting, but they may materially affect the review process). No: reject the slide (note that slides may become faded or suffer ‘dry back’ of mountant with age. Yes: assess the cytological appearances of the slide. Click Refresh button for SSL Information at the Safety Information section.

Islide note4 verification#

Decision point 1: is the slide suitable for review? The last verification results, performed on (February 19, 2019) show that has an invalid SSL certificate. Starting point: a slide is identified for review. The cervical cytology slide review process